Citizens are today demanding transparency and accountability from their elected representatives
In Switzerland the political system is founded on the principle of “popular sovereignty”, emphasizing that ultimate authority resides with the people. Direct democratic tools empower citizens to participate directly in decision-making.
A Paradigm Shift – Citizens want to be Engaged
Today it is important to recognise the paradigm shift toward more active and engaged citizenship. It's a phenomenon that isn't merely a clamour for control; it is a manifestation of a collective realization that citizens are and should be an ongoing participants in the democratic process.
The convergence of digital connectivity, social justice movements, increased voter participation, and community engagement reflects a society awakening to its potential and asserting its right to actively influence the political decisions that shape its destiny. It is no longer something that is the preserve of Switzerland, it is something multitudes are clamouring for. People want to have a say throughout the tenure of the governments elected to represent them.
Recognition is needed
In contemplating the present landscape, our political leaders must delve into the profundity of this insight and undertake a re-evaluation of antiquated and entrenched governmental structures.
The foundations of modern governance were crafted in an era of relative disconnection, however today they demand a profound recalibration to align with the contemporary reality where individuals are acutely aware of their surroundings.
People now harbour a profound sense of ownership in determining the trajectory of their governance, urging a redefined role and participation in the intricate dance between the governed and those who govern.
The proliferation of the internet and the advent of social media platforms in the late 20th and early 21st centuries mark a significant juncture when the technological world created more connections among ordinary people. The widespread adoption of the internet allowed individuals to communicate, share information, and connect with others on a global scale.
As you know, in Switzerland, referendums are a common tool for direct decision-making. Citizens can vote on specific issues, such as proposed laws or constitutional amendments. A show of hands is not ordinarily used, but citizens cast secret ballots either at polling stations or through mail-in voting.
Citizens can also propose legislative changes or amendments to the constitution through popular initiatives. If a certain number of signatures are collected, the proposed initiative is put to a vote, and citizens decide its fate.
In Switzerland, a citizens' initiative, also known as a popular initiative or people's initiative, is a constitutional right that allows citizens to propose changes to the federal constitution. The citizens' initiative is a key element of the Swiss system of Direct Democracy, empowering the population to actively participate in shaping the country's legal and constitutional framework.
Subsidiarity is becoming more important
Swiss federalism operates on the principle of subsidiarity, emphasizing that decisions should be made at the most localized level of government possible. In this system, if a particular matter is not explicitly designated for federal oversight, it automatically becomes the responsibility of the individual cantons. This decentralized approach aligns with Switzerland's dedication to Direct Democracy and the empowerment of local governance structures.
Optimal Manageability & Localism
Optimal manageability in the realms of political and geographical governance refers to the effective and efficient administration of a territory, taking into account its size, diversity, and the distribution of resources.
Achieving optimal manageability entails striking a balance that allows for responsive governance, streamlined decision-making, and equitable resource allocation. In political governance, it involves structuring institutions and systems in a manner that fosters representation, accountability, and adaptability to the needs of the populace.
Geographically, optimal manageability considers the practicality of governing a territory, recognizing the challenges posed by size, topography, and population distribution. Striving for optimal manageability seeks to enhance the overall functionality of a political entity, ensuring that it can meet the diverse needs of its constituents while maintaining a level of governance that is both effective and sustainable. This works in Switzerland with the tools of direct democracy at Federal, Cantonal and Communal levels.
Diluting Elite Power
A key element of the Swiss system is the dilution of elite power. Direct Democracy disperses decision-making power among a larger group of citizens, diluting the influence of a small elite.
This can lead to a more equitable distribution of power and a reduction in the disproportionate influence of certain groups. It also means that elected representatives may be held more directly accountable when citizens have the power to make decisions themselves.
This can lead to greater responsiveness to the needs and preferences of the broader population. In addition, it creates the possibility of curbing special interests and is a check against special interest groups that might otherwise exert undue influence over representatives.
When individuals consciously choose to immerse themselves in political activities and decision-making processes, they set in motion the potential for a profound and widespread transformation in societal mindset.
This shift becomes a catalyst, playing a pivotal role in influencing the very fabric of political conduct. At its core, the act of getting ordinary citizens actively involved in shaping the political discourse is an endeavour that holds the promise of redefining the dynamics between the governed and the governing.
In summary, being disregarded and unrepresented by our governments in an era of unprecedented technological connectivity is not only insulting but outdated. The landscape of governance has evolved, and the voices of individuals, now empowered by technology to express their concerns publicly, are discovering common interests and shared sentiments.
The government of a decade or two ago is no longer applicable, as the current populace seeks to have their voices heard and not be overlooked during the periods in which elected governments wield supposed delegated authority. The notion of "vote for me and then go away for the next 4/5 years" is no longer a viable option, if we are to preserves and evolve our democracies and recognise the new reality that people clearly want to be involved in the decisions that impact their lives.
Looking to Switzerland for me represents a step towards a more inclusive governance model. The sands have shifted.
If you've enjoyed this post and you want to tweet it on X, here's the link: https://x.com/DirectDemToday/status/1841417131323244971
Comentários