I’m going through an analysis of different dystopian movies 🎥 and trying to find elements of direct democracy. One of my all time favourites is probably one of the first.
Fritz Lang's seminal 1927 film "Metropolis" offers a visionary glimpse into a future society sharply divided between the oppressed ordinary people and the privileged elite.
The narrative unfolds in a towering, dystopian city (a bit like the 15 minute ones they want to incarcerate us in) where the workers toil in subterranean depths, ensuring the luxurious lifestyles of the elite who reside above ground.
At the heart of this social commentary is the story of Freder, the son of the city's mastermind, Joh Fredersen. When Freder encounters Maria, a compassionate figure among the workers, he is awakened to the suffering and injustice endured by the lower classes, as they are called by the so-called elite.
As the plot progresses, Maria's call for a mediator—"the heart"—to bridge the divide between "the head" (the elite) and "the hands" (the workers) gains momentum.
The climax sees the workers, driven to desperation, rise up against their oppressive conditions, leading to a cataclysmic confrontation. The resolution, however, deviates from mere revolution.
It presents an imaginative transition towards a form of direct democracy. In this envisioned future, the power dynamics shift significantly as the elite are compelled to negotiate (ha hah ha) and collaborate directly with the workers.
This move towards direct democracy symbolizes a radical transformation. For the people, it means gaining a voice and an active role in the decisions that shape their lives, fostering a sense of empowerment and collective responsibility.
The film suggests that the true path to freedom and equity lies not in the mere overthrow of the elites but in establishing a system where dialogue and cooperation replace dominance and submission. (On a personal note - some need to be held accountable as well - big time).
For the so-called elites, this shift is profound and unsettling. It demands relinquishing absolute control and embracing a new reality where their authority is no longer unchallenged. (That’s a good start).
The film posits that their future stability depends on recognizing the humanity and rights of ordinary people, thereby redefining their roles from rulers to equals in a democratic process. (direct democracy is the great equalizer).
"Metropolis" ultimately envisions a future where social harmony and progress are achieved through mutual respect and shared governance, illustrating that true liberation arises from unity and democratic engagement.
This imaginative leap towards direct democracy challenges both the oppressed and the oppressors to transcend their roles, highlighting the transformative power of the human will.
Although it’s a silent movie it’s brilliant watched with any music by Kraftwerk in the background or even, dare I say Jean- Michelle Jarre.
Comments