This is a lengthy but easily readable article which explores various aspects of Switzerland's system of municipal autonomy, intercantonal cooperation, localism, and subsidiarity.
To read the full article click the link below:
Here is an taster from the introduction:
The main aim of this study is to examine how the mature [con]federation of Switzerland approaches local (municipal) governance. It first assesses whether local autonomy arrangement is adequate. The study then assesses how local governments utilize the mechanisms of intergovernmental cooperative bodies to address public service delivery issues that cannot be met by a single local government. In doing so, beyond a secondary data sources, the study has used different instruments of primary data collection, including key informant interview, in-depth interview, and in-house discussion with a group of pertinent experts from the Canton of Bern.
The finding of this study reveals that local governments in Switzerland have adequate autonomy in the sense that they have constitutional rights to exist, freedom to choose owns’ political and administrative structures, select local leaders without coercion from the cantonal or federal leaders, and local public expenditure responsibilities match with locally raised revenues.
Also, different intergovernmental cooperative bodies- inter-municipal cooperation, Swiss municipal association, Swiss cities association, regional conference and tripartite conference of agglomerations—have been utilized for addressing matters that couldn’t be met by a local government per se. This case study, therefore, contends that effective local governance is a function of adequate local/municipal autonomy and intergovernmental cooperation and consultation.
This study argues that that effective local governance in a federal setting of Switzerland is a function of adequate local autonomy and intergovernmental cooperation between the different orders of government. Local governments’ autonomy is adequate in Switzerland in the sense that the local governments have the constitutional right to exist, the freedom to choose their own political and administrative structures, select local leaders without pressure from the canton and federal leaders, and local public expenditure responsibilities largely match with locally raised revenues.
Interestingly, Switzerland employs intricate intergovernmental cooperation and consultative mechanisms for addressing matters of policy implementation, public service provision and coordination of dynamic issues of governance across jurisdictional boundaries and sectors. Hence, the findings of this case study would be valuable for policy makers and practitioners grappling with a lack of good governance and ineffective decentralization at the local level.
To continue reading click the link:
Comentarios