What are quangos?
Quangos, or quasi-autonomous non-governmental organizations, are entities that operate independently of direct governmental control but are funded and overseen by the government to perform public functions.
These organizations often straddle the line between public and private sectors, enabling them to provide services, regulate industries, or advise on policy without being directly subject to the same levels of accountability as formal governmental institutions.
Critics argue strongly that quangos can dilute democratic control, creating bureaucracies that are insulated from public oversight and fostering inefficiency or unresponsiveness.
In a direct democracy system like Switzerland’s, the existence of quangos might be inherently limited by the mechanisms of public oversight and decentralization.
Switzerland’s model disperses power widely through its cantonal system, wherein each canton operates as a semi-sovereign entity with its own constitution, legislative processes, and civil service. This framework promotes local accountability and prevents the concentration of authority that often gives rise to quangos.
To curtail or avoid the development of quangos in such a system, several mechanisms come into play. First, the Swiss tradition of direct democracy allows citizens to challenge or propose legislation through referenda and initiatives.
This direct involvement in policymaking acts as a safeguard against the unchecked growth of quasi-autonomous bodies. Any attempt to establish a quango would likely face scrutiny and require justification to both cantonal and federal constituents, minimizing the likelihood of such bodies gaining unchecked authority.
Second, Switzerland’s decentralized governance reduces the need for large, centralized organizations to oversee nationwide functions.
Cantons handle most administrative and regulatory duties independently, tailoring services to local needs. This localized approach reduces reliance on external, hybrid entities like quangos, as each canton maintains its own civil service to directly execute policies and programs.
Finally, Swiss principles of subsidiarity—where decisions are made at the lowest possible level of government—further limit the role of intermediaries like quangos.
In a system where accountability is a cornerstone and power is deeply fragmented, there’s little room or need for institutions that operate outside direct public and governmental control. If a function needs to be performed, it’s typically managed by either a canton or a municipality, subject to direct oversight by elected representatives and, by extension, the people.
So, to summarize quangos are unlikely to thrive in Switzerland’s direct democracy because power is widely dispersed, citizens exercise strong oversight through referenda, and subsidiarity keeps governance close to the local level.
This structure leaves little incentive or opportunity to establish bodies that might operate beyond public accountability.
Maybe we need more #DirectDemocracy like the Swiss!
Click the link to learn more about QUANGOS
Comentarios